M.Natarajan K.J.PARTHASARATHY, Barsha Gurung,V.P.Parivallal vs G.Thangavelu Advocate - S.Arjun, J.Prithivi Counsel for Caveator — SA/355/2026

Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA011561172025

Filing Number

SA/111134/2025

Filing Date

16-Jul-2025

Registration No

SA/355/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Declaration ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.Natarajan K.J.PARTHASARATHY, Barsha Gurung,V.P.Parivallal

  2. 2.N.Kalamani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.G.Thangavelu Advocate - S.Arjun, J.Prithivi Counsel for Caveator

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. SountharView PDF

    Case Summary: SA/355/2026 The Second Appeal was admitted by Justice S. Sounthar on two substantial questions of law concerning an immovable property dispute. The court will examine whether the First Appellate Court's judgment was valid given the Power of Attorney (09.04.2001) and Sale Agreement (25.04.2001) allegedly failed to convey property rights under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and whether the court erred by ignoring the appellant's earlier title deed (31.01.2002) compared to the respondent's later title deed (13.06.2002). The matter was adjourned for four weeks with directions to obtain records from lower courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/355/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/355/2026 The Second Appeal was admitted by Justice S. Sounthar on two substantial questions of law concerning an immovable property dispute. The court will examine whether the First Appellate Court's judgment was valid given the Power of Attorney (09.04.2001) and Sale Agreement (25.04.2001) allegedly failed to convey property rights under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and whether the court erred by ignoring the appellant's earlier title deed (31.01.2002) compared to the respondent's later title deed (13.06.2002). The matter was adjourned for four weeks with directions to obtain records from lower courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case