G.ROOPA vs THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER — CMP/19158/2025

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 24th April 2026.

CNR: HCMA011528212025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CMP/108590/2025

Filing Date

14-07-2025

Registration No

CMP/19158/2025

Registration Date

05-08-2025

Judge

Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

Coram

Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Motor Vehicles ( 111 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

G.ROOPA

Adv. N.Umapathi,G.VINOTH,G.VINOTH, S.KUMARAN,G.VINOTH

Respondent(s)

THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER

Adv. (FOR R

,VAKALAT RETURN TO M/S.A.MOHAMED ISMAIL ,VIDE TRACKING SHEET FILED,R-4 DELIVERED ON 26.03.2026,PRIVATE NOTICE,-------,BATTA WITH PETITION & ENCLOSURES DUE REG R4,VIDE C/O DT:16.03.2026,M/S.EDWIN PRABAKAR, LEARNED, STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER ACCEPTS NOTICE FOR RR1 TO 3 1123

The Regional Transport Officer

The Regional Transport Offier

Varrsha Ford Limited

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE , Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

16-03-2026

MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS

24-04-2026

After Notice Cases

15-04-2026

MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS

Orders

24-04-2026
Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.ARUL MURUGAN

The Madras High Court allowed G. Roopa's application to condone a 292-day delay in filing an appeal against the Transport Commissioner and others, finding no serious objection and adequate cause shown. The court directed the registry to number the appeal and list it for admission the following week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court allowed G. Roopa's application to condone a 292-day delay in filing an appeal against the Transport Commissioner and others, finding no serious objection and adequate cause shown. The court directed the registry to number the appeal and list it for admission the following week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case