Applause Entertainment Private Limited M/S.ARUN C MOHAN, MOB-9884194710,UDHITHAA KOTA,R.ADITHYA SHRI,BRINDA MOHAN,SHRUTHI SRINIVASAN,SWABHHI TYAGI,RUPIKAA SRINIVASAN vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and 39 others — OA/593/2026

Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA011346492026

Filing Number

OA/98089/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

OA/593/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMMERCIAL SUITS ( 179 )

Sub-Category

Copyright ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Applause Entertainment Private Limited M/S.ARUN C MOHAN, MOB-9884194710,UDHITHAA KOTA,R.ADITHYA SHRI,BRINDA MOHAN,SHRUTHI SRINIVASAN,SWABHHI TYAGI,RUPIKAA SRINIVASAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and 39 others

  2. 2.Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd

  3. 3.Bharti Airtel Limited

  4. 4.Aircel Cellular Limited

  5. 5.Hathway Cable And Datacom Limited

  6. 6.Tata Communication Limited

  7. 7.Idea Cellular Limited

  8. 8.Reliance Communications Infrastructure Limited

  9. 9.Tata Teleservices Ltd

  10. 10.Joister Infoserve Private Limited

  11. 11.Gtpl Hathway Ltd

  12. 12.Tikona Infinet Private Limited

  13. 13.Sify Technologies Limited

  14. 14.Siti Broadband Services Pvt Ltd

  15. 15.You Broadband And Cable India Ltd

  16. 16.Asianet Satellite Communications

  17. 17.Data Infosys Limited

  18. 18.Readylink Internet Services Limited

  19. 19.Opto Network Private Limited

  20. 20.Nettlinx Limited

  21. 21.City Online Services Limited

  22. 22.Pioneer Elabs Limited

  23. 23.At And T Global Network Service India Pvt Ltd

  24. 24.Nextgen Communications Limited

  25. 25.Virgo Global Limited

  26. 26.Southern Online Bio Technologies Limited

  27. 27.Mynet Services India Private Limited

  28. 28.Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd

  29. 29.Limras Eronet Broadband Services Private Limited

  30. 30.Rs Broadband Service India Private Limited

  31. 31.Spectra Isp Networks Pvt Ltd

  32. 32.Pulse Telesystems Private Limited

  33. 33.Essel Shyam Communications Ltd

  34. 34.Five Network Solution (i) Ltd

  35. 35.Atria Convergence Technologies Limited

  36. 36.Action Lane

  37. 37.Jak Communications Pvt Ltd

  38. 38.C32 Cable Net Pvt Ltd

  39. 39.Thamizhaga Cable Tv Communication Pvt Ltd

  40. 40.Thiru Nagar Satellite Vision Pvt Ltd

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh BabuView PDF

    Case Summary: OA 593/2026 Outcome: Ad interim injunction GRANTED for four weeks. Applause Entertainment Private Limited sought interim injunctions to prevent copyright infringement of its film "Main Vaapas Aaunga" (scheduled for release on 12.06.2026) by internet service providers and cable TV operators. The High Court of Madras, recognizing likelihood of irreversible injury from unlawful broadcast, granted the ad interim injunction restraining respondents from copying, transmitting, or making available the film through any medium. The court conditioned relief on the applicant providing indemnification for potential business impact on respondents, and issued notice returnable in four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Motion Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. OA/593/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OA 593/2026 Outcome: Ad interim injunction GRANTED for four weeks. Applause Entertainment Private Limited sought interim injunctions to prevent copyright infringement of its film "Main Vaapas Aaunga" (scheduled for release on 12.06.2026) by internet service providers and cable TV operators. The High Court of Madras, recognizing likelihood of irreversible injury from unlawful broadcast, granted the ad interim injunction restraining respondents from copying, transmitting, or making available the film through any medium. The court conditioned relief on the applicant providing indemnification for potential business impact on respondents, and issued notice returnable in four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case