Solomon Vineeth Kumar vs The Chairperson — CMA/1852/2026

Case under U/s 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 1. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMA011335652026

Filing Number

CMA/97232/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

CMA/1852/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish Chandira

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish Chandira

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL ( 167 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Solomon Vineeth Kumar

    Adv. B M Subash, J.A.MOHMAD IMTHIYAZ,R.HEMARAJU,S.Bharanidharan,K.Mumtha,p.vetrivel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chairperson

  2. 2.The Regional Officer

  3. 3.Revising Committee

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish Chandira

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish ChandiraView PDF

    Case Summary: CMA No. 1852 of 2026 Solomon Vineeth Kumar's civil miscellaneous appeal challenging the Central Board of Film Certification's film rejection was adjourned. The High Court of Madras issued notice to respondents returnable by 24.06.2026, noting the appellant's contention that the Revising Committee failed to provide specific details of objectionable portions per Form VIII, which is mandated to enable film modifications or appeals. Matter posted for hearing on 24.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish Chandira

  6. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/1852/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA No. 1852 of 2026 Solomon Vineeth Kumar's civil miscellaneous appeal challenging the Central Board of Film Certification's film rejection was adjourned. The High Court of Madras issued notice to respondents returnable by 24.06.2026, noting the appellant's contention that the Revising Committee failed to provide specific details of objectionable portions per Form VIII, which is mandated to enable film modifications or appeals. Matter posted for hearing on 24.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case