M.SATHISHKUMAR vs R.VEERAN (DIED) — AS/603/2019

Case under U/s 96 R/w 41 R1 of the Code of Cp 1908 Section 96. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011319942019

Filing Number

AS/95562/2019

Filing Date

26-Jul-2019

Registration No

AS/603/2019

Registration Date

21-Aug-2019

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 96 R/w 41 R1 of the Code of Cp 1908 Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.SATHISHKUMAR

    Adv. Zeenath Begum,k.ponmani,k.ponmani, d.sathya,k.ponmani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.VEERAN (DIED)

    Adv. R-2 V.VIJAYA D/O R.VEERAN ALL ARE RESIDING AT SELLIAMMAN NAGAR METTUPATTY PERUMAPALAYAM POST, VALAPPADY TK SALEM DISTRICT 636 111 ,R-3 V.RAVI ALIAS SRIRAM,R-4 V.SAMPATH ALIAS V.PALANISAMY,PRIVATE NOTICE,AOS NOT FILED REG R2 1123

  2. 2.V.VIJAYA D/O R.VEERAN

  3. 3.V.RAVI ALIAS SRIRAMS/O R.VEERAN

  4. 4.V.SAMPATH @ V.PALANISAMY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    —View PDF

    Summary The Madras High Court partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal in a property sale dispute. While denying relief for specific performance and permanent injunction (as both sale agreements were found to violate public policy by attempting to evade stamp duty through dual pricing), the court granted a money decree requiring the defendants to refund Rs. 17 lakhs with 6% interest, finding the plaintiff's assignment of contractual rights valid and the payment receipts genuine despite the void nature of the underlying contracts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Aug-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivelView PDF

  4. 22-Aug-2025

    For Orders

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

  5. 11-Aug-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivelView PDF

  6. 11-Aug-2025

    As Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

  7. 05-Aug-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivelView PDF

  8. 05-Aug-2025

    As Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

  9. 18-Jul-2025

    As Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

  10. 10-Jul-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivelView PDF

  11. 10-Jul-2025

    As Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

  12. 27-Jun-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivelView PDF

  13. 27-Jun-2025

    As Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

  14. 11-Jun-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivelView PDF

  15. 11-Jun-2025

    As Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

  16. 01-Sep-2022

    As - Second Call

    Joint Registrar(as)

  17. 06-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 26-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. AS/603/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Madras High Court partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal in a property sale dispute. While denying relief for specific performance and permanent injunction (as both sale agreements were found to violate public policy by attempting to evade stamp duty through dual pricing), the court granted a money decree requiring the defendants to refund Rs. 17 lakhs with 6% interest, finding the plaintiff's assignment of contractual rights valid and the payment receipts genuine despite the void nature of the underlying contracts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case