Pen Media and Infrastructure Developers Private Limited M/S.P.K.LAW FIRM, NIVETHA S,S. DEEPAK (602/ vs Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited and 28 others — OA/554/2026

Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMA011280812026

Filing Number

OA/93614/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

OA/554/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMMERCIAL SUITS ( 179 )

Sub-Category

Copyright ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pen Media and Infrastructure Developers Private Limited M/S.P.K.LAW FIRM, NIVETHA S,S. DEEPAK (602/

  2. 2.,T. PANDIYAN (1422/

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited and 28 others

  2. 2.Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd

  3. 3.BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED

  4. 4.HATHWAY CABLE AND DATACOM LIMITED

  5. 5.TATA COMMUNICATION LIMITED

  6. 6.VODAFONE INDIA LIMITED

  7. 7.IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED

  8. 8.TATA TELESERVICES LTD

  9. 9.GTPL HATHWAY LTD

  10. 10.TIKONA DIGITAL NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED,

  11. 11.BG BROADBAND INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

  12. 12.SIFY TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

  13. 13.SITI BROADBAND SERVICES PVT.LTD

  14. 14.YOU BROADBAND AND CABLE INDIA LTD

  15. 15.ASIANET SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS

  16. 16.DATA INFOSYS LIMITED

  17. 17.READYLINK INTERNET SERVICES LIMITED

  18. 18.NETTLINX LIMITED

  19. 19.CITY ONLINE SERVICES LIMITED

  20. 20.PIONEER eLABS LIMITED

  21. 21.AT AND T CLOBAL NETWORK SERVICE INDIA PVT LTD

  22. 22.SOUTHERN ONLINE BIO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

  23. 23.RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LIMITED

  24. 24.LIMRAS ERONET BROADBAND SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,

  25. 25.RS BROADBAND SERVICE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

  26. 26.SPECTRA ISP NETWORKS PVT LTD

  27. 27.ESSELSHYAM COMMUNICATIONS LTD

  28. 28.FIVE NETWORK SOLUTION (I) LTD

  29. 29.ATRIA CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: OA 554 & 555/2026 Outcome: Ad interim injunction GRANTED for four weeks. Pen Media and Infrastructure Developers sought interim injunctions against internet service providers and cable TV operators to prevent copyright infringement of the cinematographic film "Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata" scheduled for release on 12.06.2026. The High Court of Madras granted ad interim injunctions for four weeks, restraining unauthorized copying, transmission, uploading, downloading, or broadcasting of the film across all mediums (websites, cable TV, DVDs, etc.). The court found irreversible injury likely without prevention of unlawful broadcast. Notice issued to respondents returnable in four weeks; matter listed thereafter. Plaintiff must provide indemnity for potential legitimate business interests affected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Motion Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. OA/554/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OA 554 & 555/2026 Outcome: Ad interim injunction GRANTED for four weeks. Pen Media and Infrastructure Developers sought interim injunctions against internet service providers and cable TV operators to prevent copyright infringement of the cinematographic film "Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata" scheduled for release on 12.06.2026. The High Court of Madras granted ad interim injunctions for four weeks, restraining unauthorized copying, transmission, uploading, downloading, or broadcasting of the film across all mediums (websites, cable TV, DVDs, etc.). The court found irreversible injury likely without prevention of unlawful broadcast. Notice issued to respondents returnable in four weeks; matter listed thereafter. Plaintiff must provide indemnity for potential legitimate business interests affected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case