Supply Chain Logistics Private Limited M/S.PASS ASSOCIATES vs G Saravanan — OA/556/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA011275362026

e-Filing Number

09-06-2026

Filing Number

OA/93179/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

OA/556/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Arbitration ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Section 9 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Supply Chain Logistics Private Limited M/S.PASS ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.G Saravanan

  2. 2.A Jayaraj Arokiyasamy

  3. 3.R Anburajan

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh BabuView PDF

    Case Summary: OA 556/2026 The Madras High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Supply Chain Logistics Private Limited against respondents G Saravanan, A Jayaraj Arokiyasamy, and R Anburajan. The applicant sought to restrain the respondents from interfering with its peaceful possession and business operations at properties in Puducherry transferred under an Asset Agreement dated 17.12.2025. The court found merit in the applicant's claim that respondents were attempting to dispossess it despite prior acknowledgment of the property transfer. The matter was adjourned for four weeks with notice to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Section 9 - Arbitration And Conciliation Act)

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. OA/556/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OA 556/2026 The Madras High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Supply Chain Logistics Private Limited against respondents G Saravanan, A Jayaraj Arokiyasamy, and R Anburajan. The applicant sought to restrain the respondents from interfering with its peaceful possession and business operations at properties in Puducherry transferred under an Asset Agreement dated 17.12.2025. The court found merit in the applicant's claim that respondents were attempting to dispossess it despite prior acknowledgment of the property transfer. The matter was adjourned for four weeks with notice to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case