RANGARAJAN NARASIMHAN vs THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE — WMP/24234/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011273752026

Filing Number

WMP/93053/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WMP/24234/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )

Sub-Category

Other PIL Matters ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANGARAJAN NARASIMHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  2. 2.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  4. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER / INSPECTOR FO POLICE

  5. 5.Mrs. RAJALAKSHMI

  6. 6.Mr. T. K. Sampath Kumaran

  7. 7.The Inspector of Police

  8. 8.Mrs. Rajalakshmi

  9. 9.Mr. T. K. Sampath Kumaran

  10. 10.Mr. Lakshmi Narasimhan

  11. 11.Mr. Bharath Bhattar

  12. 12.Mr. Kannan Bhattar

  13. 13.Mr. Sampath Bhattar

  14. 14.Mr. Raghavan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    The Madras High Court granted Rangarajan Narasimhan's application to implead persons against whom a complaint was lodged (proposed respondents 5-14) as additional respondents in the writ petition, based on reasons stated in the affidavit. The Court directed the Registry to carry out the necessary amendments to the writ petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WMP/24234/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court granted Rangarajan Narasimhan's application to implead persons against whom a complaint was lodged (proposed respondents 5-14) as additional respondents in the writ petition, based on reasons stated in the affidavit. The Court directed the Registry to carry out the necessary amendments to the writ petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case