B.RAMKUMAR ADITYAN M/S. S. Sankar, B. MARIAPPA BABU ,S. KRISHNAN vs The Secretary, — WP/22340/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011267202026
Filing Number
WP/92599/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/22340/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )
Sub-Category
Other PIL Matters ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B.RAMKUMAR ADITYAN M/S. S. Sankar, B. MARIAPPA BABU ,S. KRISHNAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Secretary,
-
2.The Secretary,
-
3.The Chief Election Commissioner,
-
4.The Additional Chief Secretary,
-
5.The Chief Electoral Officer Cum Principal Secretary,
-
6.The Secretary,
-
7.The Director
-
8.The Regional Director,
-
9.The Director General of Police,
-
10.The General Secretary,
-
11.The General Secretary,
-
12.Mr.S.Jeyakumar,
-
13.Tmt.P.Sathyabama,
-
14.Tmt. K.Maragatham Kumaravel,
-
15.Dr.E.Subaya @ Esakki Subaya,
-
16.mr.Anand Alias Munusamy,
-
17.Mr.Aadhav Arjuna
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF
Case Summary: WP/22340/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed a public interest litigation petition filed by an AIADMK member seeking CBI investigation into alleged corruption involving four legislators who resigned from the Tamil Nadu Assembly and joined the rival TVK party. The court held that the petition was entirely based on conjecture and suspicion without concrete evidence of any quid pro quo or unlawful inducement, characterizing it as a "fishing expedition." The court emphasized that CBI investigations cannot be ordered merely on subjective beliefs, and political party-switching alone—without proof of corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act—does not constitute criminal misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/22340/2026
Case Summary: WP/22340/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed a public interest litigation petition filed by an AIADMK member seeking CBI investigation into alleged corruption involving four legislators who resigned from the Tamil Nadu Assembly and joined the rival TVK party. The court held that the petition was entirely based on conjecture and suspicion without concrete evidence of any quid pro quo or unlawful inducement, characterizing it as a "fishing expedition." The court emphasized that CBI investigations cannot be ordered merely on subjective beliefs, and political party-switching alone—without proof of corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act—does not constitute criminal misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts