ANANYA RADHAKRISHNAN vs THE JOINT SECRETARY to GOVERNMENT OF INDIA — WP/21971/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Next hearing: 10th August 2026.

Next hearing 10-Aug-2026

CNR: HCMA011256892026

Filing Number

WP/91926/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/21971/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )

Sub-Category

Other Matters ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANYA RADHAKRISHNAN

    Adv. R.Prabhakaran,OVEYA ,OVEYA , DHRUV RAM KUMAR ,JESSIE SHAPTHIKA ,SOWMIYA D ,VASANTHAKUMAR ,REVATHI B ,OVEYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE JOINT SECRETARY to GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

  2. 2.The Union of India

  3. 3.State of Tamil Nadu

  4. 4.State of Tamilnadu

  5. 5.State of Tamil nadu

Case History

  1. 10-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Aug-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/21971/2026 The Madras High Court admitted Ananya Radhakrishnan's writ petition against the Joint Secretary to Government of India and others for hearing on 12.06.2026. A rule nisi was issued with records to be called within eight weeks. The fifth respondent was deleted from the case as the petitioner's counsel did not press claims against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/21971/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/21971/2026 The Madras High Court admitted Ananya Radhakrishnan's writ petition against the Joint Secretary to Government of India and others for hearing on 12.06.2026. A rule nisi was issued with records to be called within eight weeks. The fifth respondent was deleted from the case as the petitioner's counsel did not press claims against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case