N.SARAVANAN vs The Secretary to Government — WP/22882/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011252762026
Filing Number
WP/91609/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/22882/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N.SARAVANAN
Adv. S.Velmurugan,M.SUDHAN ,M.SUDHAN , S.KEERTHANA ,M.SUDHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Secretary to Government
-
2.The Director/commissioner
-
3.The District collector
-
4.The Superintendent of police
-
5.The District Forests officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF
Summary of WP/22882/2026 N. Saravanan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct authorities to investigate illegal cutting of sandalwood and teakwood trees from Government Polytechnic College campus at Palacode, identify perpetrators and negligent officials, and protect remaining trees. The High Court of Madras dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the court again, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/22882/2026
Summary of WP/22882/2026 N. Saravanan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct authorities to investigate illegal cutting of sandalwood and teakwood trees from Government Polytechnic College campus at Palacode, identify perpetrators and negligent officials, and protect remaining trees. The High Court of Madras dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the court again, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts