M/s Sai Krishna Steel Industires R. HEMALATHA, Prashanth N,Devanand J R,E. Keerthavarshini,A. Rithika,Priyadharshini,C.S. Sree naryan,S. Ruckmani Devi,Raju D vs The Assistant Commissioner ST — WP/21624/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011210482026
e-Filing Number
02-06-2026
Filing Number
WP/88453/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/21624/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Sai Krishna Steel Industires R. HEMALATHA, Prashanth N,Devanand J R,E. Keerthavarshini,A. Rithika,Priyadharshini,C.S. Sree naryan,S. Ruckmani Devi,Raju D
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Assistant Commissioner ST
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP 21624/2026 - M/s Sai Krishna Steel Industries v. State Tax Officer The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order (dated 17.11.2025) for AY 2019-20 that was issued without hearing the petitioner, finding a violation of natural justice. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, conditioning remand on the petitioner remitting 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months after providing reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/21624/2026
Case Summary: WP 21624/2026 - M/s Sai Krishna Steel Industries v. State Tax Officer The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order (dated 17.11.2025) for AY 2019-20 that was issued without hearing the petitioner, finding a violation of natural justice. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, conditioning remand on the petitioner remitting 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months after providing reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts