M/s Comander Veg Oil Industry R. HEMALATHA, C.S. Sree naryan,S. Ruckmani Devi,Raju D,Priyadharshini,A. Rithika,E. Keerthavarshini,Devanand J R,Prashanth N vs The Assistant Commissioner ST — WP/21611/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011210462026
e-Filing Number
02-06-2026
Filing Number
WP/88451/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/21611/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Comander Veg Oil Industry R. HEMALATHA, C.S. Sree naryan,S. Ruckmani Devi,Raju D,Priyadharshini,A. Rithika,E. Keerthavarshini,Devanand J R,Prashanth N
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Assistant Commissioner ST
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP 21611/2026 - M/s Commander Veg Oil Industry v. Assistant Commissioner ST The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 15.12.2025 issued against Commander Veg Oil Industry for FY 2020-21, finding it was passed without providing the petitioner a reasonable hearing opportunity. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the respondent must issue a fresh order within three months following proper opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/21611/2026
Case Summary: WP 21611/2026 - M/s Commander Veg Oil Industry v. Assistant Commissioner ST The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 15.12.2025 issued against Commander Veg Oil Industry for FY 2020-21, finding it was passed without providing the petitioner a reasonable hearing opportunity. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the respondent must issue a fresh order within three months following proper opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts