Tvl.Karthik Agencies P Arumugam, A.SATHEESH MURUGAN vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 — WP/21580/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011210312026

e-Filing Number

02-06-2026

Filing Number

WP/88441/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/21580/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tvl.Karthik Agencies P Arumugam, A.SATHEESH MURUGAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy State Tax Officer 1

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Summary of WP 21580/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 09.12.2025 issued by the Deputy State Tax Officer against Tvl. Karthik Agencies, finding it was passed without affording the petitioner a reasonable hearing opportunity, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months following a fair hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/21580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP 21580/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 09.12.2025 issued by the Deputy State Tax Officer against Tvl. Karthik Agencies, finding it was passed without affording the petitioner a reasonable hearing opportunity, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months following a fair hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case