M/S.Kolkata Safety Products MR.K.Vaitheeswaran, MRS.RADHIKA CHANDRA SEKHAR vs The Deputy State Tax Officer — WP/21606/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011203352026

e-Filing Number

09-05-2026

Filing Number

WP/87937/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

WP/21606/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S.Kolkata Safety Products MR.K.Vaitheeswaran, MRS.RADHIKA CHANDRA SEKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy State Tax Officer

  2. 2.The Deputy Commissioner (CT)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/21606/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order issued by the Deputy State Tax Officer (dated 08.12.2025) against M/S Kolkata Safety Products for the period April 2021-March 2022, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner in violation of natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/21606/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/21606/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order issued by the Deputy State Tax Officer (dated 08.12.2025) against M/S Kolkata Safety Products for the period April 2021-March 2022, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner in violation of natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case