Hotel Lala, Adithya Reddy, VAANI SREEKANT IYER,DHANESH,PRANAV DEVARAJ,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 2 — WP/21573/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011199692026

e-Filing Number

23-05-2026

Filing Number

WP/87666/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

WP/21573/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hotel Lala, Adithya Reddy, VAANI SREEKANT IYER,DHANESH,PRANAV DEVARAJ,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy State Tax Officer 2

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 25.11.2025 issued by the Deputy State Tax Officer against Hotel Lala for FY 2021-22, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which a fresh order must be issued within three months with reasonable opportunity granted to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/21573/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 25.11.2025 issued by the Deputy State Tax Officer against Hotel Lala for FY 2021-22, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which a fresh order must be issued within three months with reasonable opportunity granted to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case