JESITHAMERI M/S. V. SRIMATHI, avinash wadhwani vs PUSHPA — SA/411/2026

Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA011194262026

Filing Number

SA/87199/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

SA/411/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Declaration ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JESITHAMERI M/S. V. SRIMATHI, avinash wadhwani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUSHPA

  2. 2.Senthilkumar

  3. 3.Ragivgandhi

  4. 4.Arokiyamari

  5. 5.Jonas

  6. 6.James

  7. 7.Ursulameri

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. SountharView PDF

    Case Summary - S.A. No. 411 of 2026 The second appeal was admitted on two substantial questions of law: (1) whether an oral partition plea without documentary evidence or revenue records can be legally accepted, and (2) whether the first appellate court erred in granting a declaration based on a settlement deed without proof of the settlor's title. The court directed the registry to obtain records from lower courts, issued notice to respondents returnable in four weeks, and adjourned the matter for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/411/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - S.A. No. 411 of 2026 The second appeal was admitted on two substantial questions of law: (1) whether an oral partition plea without documentary evidence or revenue records can be legally accepted, and (2) whether the first appellate court erred in granting a declaration based on a settlement deed without proof of the settlor's title. The court directed the registry to obtain records from lower courts, issued notice to respondents returnable in four weeks, and adjourned the matter for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case