Kazhipathur Neelkamal Owners Association (KNKOA) vs National Company Law Tribunal — WP/21281/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011174622026
Filing Number
WP/85815/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/21281/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
General Miscellaneous ( 78 )
Sub-Category
National Company Law Tribunal ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kazhipathur Neelkamal Owners Association (KNKOA)
Adv. Ashok Menon,PADMAJA MOHAN,PADMAJA MOHAN, NAYAN JABHAKH,B.BALACHANDER,PADMAJA MOHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.National Company Law Tribunal
-
2.C.A.Mahalingam Suresh Kumar
-
3.G.Saravanan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF
Case Summary: WP/21281/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Kazhipathur Neelkamal Owners Association (KNKOA) seeking to quash an NCLT order dated 21.08.2025 on the ground that the association was not a party to the proceedings. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the competent forum, which the court granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no order on costs and interim applications closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/21281/2026
Case Summary: WP/21281/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Kazhipathur Neelkamal Owners Association (KNKOA) seeking to quash an NCLT order dated 21.08.2025 on the ground that the association was not a party to the proceedings. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the competent forum, which the court granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no order on costs and interim applications closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts