S.THANGAMARI S.BALAJI, G.SRINIVASAN vs The Authorized officer — WP/20803/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011165282026
Filing Number
WP/85038/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
WP/20803/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Banking ( 15 )
Sub-Category
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, ( 33 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.THANGAMARI S.BALAJI, G.SRINIVASAN
-
2.V.Ganesan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Authorized officer
-
2.A.Boopathi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF
Case Summary: WP/20803/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by S. Thangamari and V. Ganesan seeking to set aside a DRAT order dated 09.07.2025 that rejected their pre-deposit amount and appeal application. The petitioners' counsel requested withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, which the court granted with no order on costs and permission to file a consolidated petition upon payment of separate court-fee within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Admission (Wp)
Honourable Mr Justice G. R. Swaminathan , Honourable Mr.Justice V. Lakshminarayanan
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/20803/2026
Case Summary: WP/20803/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by S. Thangamari and V. Ganesan seeking to set aside a DRAT order dated 09.07.2025 that rejected their pre-deposit amount and appeal application. The petitioners' counsel requested withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, which the court granted with no order on costs and permission to file a consolidated petition upon payment of separate court-fee within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts