P.Milany vs Election Commission of India — WP/20680/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011158742026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/84580/2026
Filing Date
25-05-2026
Registration No
WP/20680/2026
Registration Date
26-05-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice G. R. SWAMINATHAN , Honourable Mr.Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice G. R. SWAMINATHAN , Honourable Mr.Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Election ( 55 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Milany
Adv. J.Vinoth,R.Gopinath,R.Gopinath, S.Santhan,R.Gopinath
Respondent(s)
Election Commission of India
The District Election Officer/Commissioner,
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G. R. SWAMINATHAN , Honourable Mr.Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
ADMISSION (WP)
ADMISSION (WP)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | ADMISSION (WP) |
| 29-05-2026 | ADMISSION (WP) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 20680/2026 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED P. Milany, an unsuccessful candidate in the 2026 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election (Chepauk Thiruvallikeni constituency), sought certified copies of election documents needed to file an election petition. The Election Commission argued documents would only be released after 45 days from results declaration. The High Court of Madras held that Rule 93(2) of the Conduct of Election Rules 1961 mandates disclosure of election papers to the public, and withholding them until the 45-day election petition deadline expired would effectively deny candidates their statutory right to challenge elections. The court directed the District Election Officer to issue all requested certified copies within two weeks, rejecting the Commission's restrictive interpretation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 20680/2026 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED P. Milany, an unsuccessful candidate in the 2026 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election (Chepauk Thiruvallikeni constituency), sought certified copies of election documents needed to file an election petition. The Election Commission argued documents would only be released after 45 days from results declaration. The High Court of Madras held that Rule 93(2) of the Conduct of Election Rules 1961 mandates disclosure of election papers to the public, and withholding them until the 45-day election petition deadline expired would effectively deny candidates their statutory right to challenge elections. The court directed the District Election Officer to issue all requested certified copies within two weeks, rejecting the Commission's restrictive interpretation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts