P.Milany vs Election Commission of India — WP/20680/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCMA011158742026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/84580/2026

Filing Date

25-05-2026

Registration No

WP/20680/2026

Registration Date

26-05-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice G. R. SWAMINATHAN , Honourable Mr.Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice G. R. SWAMINATHAN , Honourable Mr.Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Election ( 55 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

P.Milany

Adv. J.Vinoth,R.Gopinath,R.Gopinath, S.Santhan,R.Gopinath

Respondent(s)

Election Commission of India

The District Election Officer/Commissioner,

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G. R. SWAMINATHAN , Honourable Mr.Justice V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

27-05-2026

ADMISSION (WP)

29-05-2026

ADMISSION (WP)

Orders

08-06-2026

Case Summary: WP 20680/2026 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED P. Milany, an unsuccessful candidate in the 2026 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election (Chepauk Thiruvallikeni constituency), sought certified copies of election documents needed to file an election petition. The Election Commission argued documents would only be released after 45 days from results declaration. The High Court of Madras held that Rule 93(2) of the Conduct of Election Rules 1961 mandates disclosure of election papers to the public, and withholding them until the 45-day election petition deadline expired would effectively deny candidates their statutory right to challenge elections. The court directed the District Election Officer to issue all requested certified copies within two weeks, rejecting the Commission's restrictive interpretation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 20680/2026 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED P. Milany, an unsuccessful candidate in the 2026 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election (Chepauk Thiruvallikeni constituency), sought certified copies of election documents needed to file an election petition. The Election Commission argued documents would only be released after 45 days from results declaration. The High Court of Madras held that Rule 93(2) of the Conduct of Election Rules 1961 mandates disclosure of election papers to the public, and withholding them until the 45-day election petition deadline expired would effectively deny candidates their statutory right to challenge elections. The court directed the District Election Officer to issue all requested certified copies within two weeks, rejecting the Commission's restrictive interpretation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case