Angamuthu vs Nagarajan — CRP/3060/2026

Case under U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 1. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Next hearing 06-Jul-2026

CNR: HCMA011140842026

Filing Number

CRP/83462/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

CRP/3060/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselvi

Coram

Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselvi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )

Sub-Category

S. 115 of CPC ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Angamuthu

    Adv. K.N.Nataraaj,M.Senthilkumar,M.Senthilkumar, M.Murali Krishna,S.Udhaya Bharathi,M.Senthilkumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagarajan

  2. 2.Saroja

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jul-2026

    CRP - Cases

    Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselvi

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mrs.Justice T.v.thamilselviView PDF

    Case Summary: CRP 3060/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. Notice issued to second respondent Saroja (returnable 06.07.2026). Execution petition proceedings stayed pending next hearing. Key Details: Angamuthu's civil revision petition challenges a lower court decree obtained without his knowledge. He alleges he paid Rs. 10 lakhs to Nagarajan, who refused to return it, with Nagarajan's son (an advocate) allegedly receiving the funds. Petitioner claims collusion and political influence. First respondent Nagarajan's counsel denies involvement in the transaction between the two respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/3060/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRP 3060/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. Notice issued to second respondent Saroja (returnable 06.07.2026). Execution petition proceedings stayed pending next hearing. Key Details: Angamuthu's civil revision petition challenges a lower court decree obtained without his knowledge. He alleges he paid Rs. 10 lakhs to Nagarajan, who refused to return it, with Nagarajan's son (an advocate) allegedly receiving the funds. Petitioner claims collusion and political influence. First respondent Nagarajan's counsel denies involvement in the transaction between the two respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case