ASHRAF S vs The Secretary to Government — WP/20145/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011140432026

Filing Number

WP/83433/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

WP/20145/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Labour ( 95 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHRAF S

    Adv. C.Jagadish,N.C.Ashok Kumar,N.C.Ashok Kumar, A. Gabrial,S.Uma maheshwari,N.C.Ashok Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Secretary to Government

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Labour

  3. 3.The Labour Officer

  4. 4.Movate Technologies Private Limited (Formerly CSS Corp Private Limited),

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. SurenderView PDF

    The Madras High Court dismissed Ashraf S's writ petition seeking mandamus to direct government labour authorities to instruct Movate Technologies Private Limited to regularize his exit from service with compensation and issue relieving and experience certificates. The court found the petition not maintainable because private companies are not subject to writ jurisdiction and the relief sought was inappropriate for a writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice G. R. Swaminathan

  4. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice G. R. SwaminathanView PDF

  5. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/20145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed Ashraf S's writ petition seeking mandamus to direct government labour authorities to instruct Movate Technologies Private Limited to regularize his exit from service with compensation and issue relieving and experience certificates. The court found the petition not maintainable because private companies are not subject to writ jurisdiction and the relief sought was inappropriate for a writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case