SADHASIVAM M/S.C.KULANTHAIVEL, S. INDHUMATHI,K. VANISHRI vs P. PRAVEEN KUMAR — CMA/1628/2026

Case under U/s 173 of Motor Vehicle Act Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA011139692025

Filing Number

CMA/80217/2025

Filing Date

02-Jun-2025

Registration No

CMA/1628/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish Chandira

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish Chandira

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL ( 167 )

Sub-Category

S. 173 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Act ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 173 of Motor Vehicle Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADHASIVAM M/S.C.KULANTHAIVEL, S. INDHUMATHI,K. VANISHRI

  2. 2.SENTHILKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P. PRAVEEN KUMAR

  2. 2.S. KATHIRVEL

  3. 3.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

  4. 4.JEEVANANDHAM

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish ChandiraView PDF

    Case Summary: CMA/1628/2026 The petition filed by Sadhasivam, C. Kulanthaivel, S. Indhumathi, K. Vanishri, and Senthilkumar against P. Praveen Kumar, S. Kathirvel, and The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. was admitted. Notice was issued to respondents 1, 2, and 4, returnable in six weeks, with private notice also permitted. The Registry was directed to obtain records from the Tribunal, and the matter was adjourned for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice A.d.jagadish Chandira

  4. 02-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/1628/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA/1628/2026 The petition filed by Sadhasivam, C. Kulanthaivel, S. Indhumathi, K. Vanishri, and Senthilkumar against P. Praveen Kumar, S. Kathirvel, and The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. was admitted. Notice was issued to respondents 1, 2, and 4, returnable in six weeks, with private notice also permitted. The Registry was directed to obtain records from the Tribunal, and the matter was adjourned for six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case