Ayisha Neelufar K.THYAGARAJAN, V.SAI SUDARSHAN vs The Assessment Unit, — WMP/21941/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011096622026

Filing Number

WMP/81498/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

WMP/21941/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ORDERED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ayisha Neelufar K.THYAGARAJAN, V.SAI SUDARSHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assessment Unit,

  2. 2.The Income Tax Officer,

  3. 3.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(Chennai-

  4. 4.,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WMP 21941/2026 The Madras High Court granted Ayisha Neelufar's petition to condone a 134-day delay in re-presenting the original writ petition (WP SR 78504/2026) against the Income Tax Assessment Unit, Income Tax Officer, and Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Chennai). Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy found sufficient cause in the affidavit supporting the delay condonation petition and accordingly allowed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission - Miscellaneous Petition

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WMP/21941/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WMP 21941/2026 The Madras High Court granted Ayisha Neelufar's petition to condone a 134-day delay in re-presenting the original writ petition (WP SR 78504/2026) against the Income Tax Assessment Unit, Income Tax Officer, and Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Chennai). Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy found sufficient cause in the affidavit supporting the delay condonation petition and accordingly allowed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case