G.Kesavan M/S.P.K.Sabapathi, M.Jayavardhanan vs G.Gajapathy Advocate - D.Manimaran, M.Mohammed Dhanish Caveators for R1,R.J.Jaykrishore Kumar,V.Nivetha Bernice — CRP/3001/2026

Case under U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NOT PRESSED on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCMA011087162026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRP/80867/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

CRP/3001/2026

Registration Date

11-05-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )

Sub-Category

Article 227 of the Constitution of India ( 44 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED FOR NOT PRESSED

Acts & Sections

U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

G.Kesavan M/S.P.K.Sabapathi, M.Jayavardhanan

K.Vijay Balaji

K.Prabhu

Respondent(s)

G.Gajapathy Advocate - D.Manimaran, M.Mohammed Dhanish Caveators for R1,R.J.Jaykrishore Kumar,V.Nivetha Bernice

Deputy Inspector General of Registration,

The District Registrar,

The Sub Registrar

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE

08-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

08-06-2026
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE

Summary of CRP No. 3001/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as not pressed after petitioners' counsel endorsed that they were not pursuing it. However, the court granted liberty to petitioners to raise all available legal grounds, including those originally raised in the CRP, in the underlying main suit (O.S. No. 2461 of 2022). No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRP No. 3001/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as not pressed after petitioners' counsel endorsed that they were not pursuing it. However, the court granted liberty to petitioners to raise all available legal grounds, including those originally raised in the CRP, in the underlying main suit (O.S. No. 2461 of 2022). No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case