G.Kesavan M/S.P.K.Sabapathi, M.Jayavardhanan vs G.Gajapathy Advocate - D.Manimaran, M.Mohammed Dhanish Caveators for R1,R.J.Jaykrishore Kumar,V.Nivetha Bernice — CRP/3001/2026

Case under U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NOT PRESSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011087162026

Filing Number

CRP/80867/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRP/3001/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )

Sub-Category

Article 227 of the Constitution of India ( 44 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED FOR NOT PRESSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Kesavan M/S.P.K.Sabapathi, M.Jayavardhanan

  2. 2.K.Vijay Balaji

  3. 3.K.Prabhu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.G.Gajapathy Advocate - D.Manimaran, M.Mohammed Dhanish Caveators for R1,R.J.Jaykrishore Kumar,V.Nivetha Bernice

  2. 2.Deputy Inspector General of Registration,

  3. 3.The District Registrar,

  4. 4.The Sub Registrar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Abdul QuddhoseView PDF

    Summary of CRP No. 3001/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as not pressed after petitioners' counsel endorsed that they were not pursuing it. However, the court granted liberty to petitioners to raise all available legal grounds, including those originally raised in the CRP, in the underlying main suit (O.S. No. 2461 of 2022). No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/3001/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRP No. 3001/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as not pressed after petitioners' counsel endorsed that they were not pursuing it. However, the court granted liberty to petitioners to raise all available legal grounds, including those originally raised in the CRP, in the underlying main suit (O.S. No. 2461 of 2022). No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case