Maersk A/S P.GIRIDHARAN, Kandeep Shravan,H.Siddarth, C.Thiagrajan vs Jaango Exports — CMP/13496/2026

Case under U/s 149 of Cpc Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011070242026

Filing Number

CMP/79778/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP/13496/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 149 of Cpc Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maersk A/S P.GIRIDHARAN, Kandeep Shravan,H.Siddarth, C.Thiagrajan

  2. 2.Maersk Line India Private Limited

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaango Exports

    Adv. PLN Associates Counsel for Caveator,V.Praveen Kumar 1123

  2. 2.A.P.Moller

  3. 3.Aux Bons Prix,

  4. 4.Don Roberto, Individual,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN,Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan ThilakavadiView PDF

    The court condoned a 115-day delay in paying a deficit court fee of Rs.124/- in an appeal. After hearing both parties and reviewing the supporting affidavit, the judges found the reasons for delay satisfactory and granted the miscellaneous petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    To Condone Delay In Deficit Court Fee

    Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/13496/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court condoned a 115-day delay in paying a deficit court fee of Rs.124/- in an appeal. After hearing both parties and reviewing the supporting affidavit, the judges found the reasons for delay satisfactory and granted the miscellaneous petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case