Boominathan Vadagai Nilayam vs Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Chit Fund Private Limited — CRP/3065/2026

Case under U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011067122026

Filing Number

CRP/79520/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRP/3065/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )

Sub-Category

S. 115 of CPC ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Boominathan Vadagai Nilayam

    Adv. P.Balamurugan,S.P. Kannan,S.P. Kannan, R. Tamilselvan,M. Manju Priya,G. Kavitha,S.P. Kannan

  2. 2.L. Nilavalan

  3. 3.S. Viswanathan

  4. 4.A.K. Vennila Eswari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Chit Fund Private Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Abdul QuddhoseView PDF

    Summary of CRP 3065/2026 The Madras High Court granted a six-week interim stay of execution proceedings against petitioners who are chit fund subscribers. The petitioners challenged the lower court's refusal to stay execution of arbitral awards, arguing pending statutory appeals under the Chit Funds Act. Justice Abdul Quddhose balanced competing interests, rejecting the petitioners' request for eight weeks but also the respondent's four-week proposal, ordering six weeks to allow appellants to seek stay from the appellate forum before execution resumes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRP/3065/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRP 3065/2026 The Madras High Court granted a six-week interim stay of execution proceedings against petitioners who are chit fund subscribers. The petitioners challenged the lower court's refusal to stay execution of arbitral awards, arguing pending statutory appeals under the Chit Funds Act. Justice Abdul Quddhose balanced competing interests, rejecting the petitioners' request for eight weeks but also the respondent's four-week proposal, ordering six weeks to allow appellants to seek stay from the appellate forum before execution resumes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case