Boominathan Vadagai Nilayam vs Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Chit Fund Private Limited — CRP/3065/2026
Case under U/s 115 of C.p.c Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011067122026
Filing Number
CRP/79520/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
CRP/3065/2026
Registration Date
20-05-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )
Sub-Category
S. 115 of CPC ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Boominathan Vadagai Nilayam
Adv. P.Balamurugan,S.P. Kannan,S.P. Kannan, R. Tamilselvan,M. Manju Priya,G. Kavitha,S.P. Kannan
L. Nilavalan
S. Viswanathan
A.K. Vennila Eswari
Respondent(s)
Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Chit Fund Private Limited
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary of CRP 3065/2026 The Madras High Court granted a six-week interim stay of execution proceedings against petitioners who are chit fund subscribers. The petitioners challenged the lower court's refusal to stay execution of arbitral awards, arguing pending statutory appeals under the Chit Funds Act. Justice Abdul Quddhose balanced competing interests, rejecting the petitioners' request for eight weeks but also the respondent's four-week proposal, ordering six weeks to allow appellants to seek stay from the appellate forum before execution resumes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRP 3065/2026 The Madras High Court granted a six-week interim stay of execution proceedings against petitioners who are chit fund subscribers. The petitioners challenged the lower court's refusal to stay execution of arbitral awards, arguing pending statutory appeals under the Chit Funds Act. Justice Abdul Quddhose balanced competing interests, rejecting the petitioners' request for eight weeks but also the respondent's four-week proposal, ordering six weeks to allow appellants to seek stay from the appellate forum before execution resumes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts