M/S.Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., M/S.R.GANESAN, P.RATHIKA,N.Mahendra Babu,N.NAGARJUNA,V.NANDHA HARI MAHESWARAN vs S.Suresh — WP/19941/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011063552026

Filing Number

WP/79206/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19941/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Labour ( 95 )

Sub-Category

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S.Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., M/S.R.GANESAN, P.RATHIKA,N.Mahendra Babu,N.NAGARJUNA,V.NANDHA HARI MAHESWARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.Suresh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. SurenderView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/19941/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed Woosu Automotive's writ petition challenging the Labour Court's April 6, 2026 order that set aside the termination of an employee designated as a "Trainee" and directed his reinstatement with back wages and service continuity. The company claimed it was denied opportunity to present evidence, but the Court found this claim "deliberate, palpably wrong," noting the Labour Court had repeatedly granted adjournments for evidence, the company filed multiple writ petitions to delay proceedings (all dismissed), and attempted to reopen evidence only after arguments concluded—11 years after the initial filing. Justice K. Surender upheld the Labour Court's decision, finding no violation of natural justice principles warranting High Court interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19941/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/19941/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed Woosu Automotive's writ petition challenging the Labour Court's April 6, 2026 order that set aside the termination of an employee designated as a "Trainee" and directed his reinstatement with back wages and service continuity. The company claimed it was denied opportunity to present evidence, but the Court found this claim "deliberate, palpably wrong," noting the Labour Court had repeatedly granted adjournments for evidence, the company filed multiple writ petitions to delay proceedings (all dismissed), and attempted to reopen evidence only after arguments concluded—11 years after the initial filing. Justice K. Surender upheld the Labour Court's decision, finding no violation of natural justice principles warranting High Court interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case