M/s. RAMIAKSHMI PARADISE K M Malarmannan, R.Sundaramurthy vs The Assessment Commissioner (ST) — WP/19697/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011060332026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/78913/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/19697/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s. RAMIAKSHMI PARADISE K M Malarmannan, R.Sundaramurthy
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Assessment Commissioner (ST)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
Summary: The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 04.06.2025 issued against M/s. Ramiakshmi Paradise without providing a hearing, finding it violated natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the Assessment Commissioner must reissue the order within three months after providing the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/19697/2026
Summary: The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 04.06.2025 issued against M/s. Ramiakshmi Paradise without providing a hearing, finding it violated natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the Assessment Commissioner must reissue the order within three months after providing the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts