Sri Sai Hearing Solution SARAVANAN G, ,S.B.Priyadarshini vs Commercial Tax Officer — WP/19856/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011059662026

e-Filing Number

29-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/78853/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19856/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Sai Hearing Solution SARAVANAN G, ,S.B.Priyadarshini

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Commercial Tax Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19856/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 22.12.2025 against Sri Sai Hearing Solution and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner challenged the assessment, arguing that its reply claiming exemption for hearing aids under Notification No.2/2017 was not duly considered. The court found the petitioner's reply lacked specific details correlating supplies with the exemption notification, but agreed reconsideration was warranted. The matter was remanded conditionally upon the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months and bank attachment to be raised upon compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19856/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19856/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 22.12.2025 against Sri Sai Hearing Solution and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner challenged the assessment, arguing that its reply claiming exemption for hearing aids under Notification No.2/2017 was not duly considered. The court found the petitioner's reply lacked specific details correlating supplies with the exemption notification, but agreed reconsideration was warranted. The matter was remanded conditionally upon the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months and bank attachment to be raised upon compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case