M/S.WOOSU AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PVT. LTD., M/S.R.GANESAN, V. NANDHA HARI MAHESWARAN ,N. NAGARJUNA ,N. MAHENDRA BABU ,R. RATHIKA vs P.SENTHAMIZH — WP/19714/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011057282026

Filing Number

WP/78674/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19714/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Labour ( 95 )

Sub-Category

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S.WOOSU AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PVT. LTD., M/S.R.GANESAN, V. NANDHA HARI MAHESWARAN ,N. NAGARJUNA ,N. MAHENDRA BABU ,R. RATHIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.SENTHAMIZH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. SurenderView PDF

    Summary of WP/19714/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed Woosu Automotive India's writ petition challenging the Labour Court's order reinstating employee P. Senthamizh with back wages and service continuity. The court found the company's claim of being denied opportunity to present evidence was "deliberate, palpably wrong," noting it had received multiple adjournments and even obtained stay orders through prior writ petitions before ultimately failing to adduce evidence. After 11 years of proceedings, the court upheld the Labour Court's decision to reject the company's belated application to reopen evidence, finding no violation of natural justice principles warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19714/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/19714/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed Woosu Automotive India's writ petition challenging the Labour Court's order reinstating employee P. Senthamizh with back wages and service continuity. The court found the company's claim of being denied opportunity to present evidence was "deliberate, palpably wrong," noting it had received multiple adjournments and even obtained stay orders through prior writ petitions before ultimately failing to adduce evidence. After 11 years of proceedings, the court upheld the Labour Court's decision to reject the company's belated application to reopen evidence, finding no violation of natural justice principles warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case