ANITA RANKA M/S.R.SUNILKUMAR, SUNDAR NARAYAN FOR APPELLANT vs SUMATHI VINAYGA MOORTHY — SA/392/2014
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011057262014
Filing Number
SA/104700/2013
Filing Date
06-Mar-2014
Registration No
SA/392/2014
Registration Date
07-Apr-2014
Judge
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
Coram
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Suits ( 149 )
Sub-Category
Permanent Injunction ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANITA RANKA M/S.R.SUNILKUMAR, SUNDAR NARAYAN FOR APPELLANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUMATHI VINAYGA MOORTHY
Adv. MISS J.GLORIA FATHIMA FOR R1 TO R5 (caveator),R1 - SUMATHI VINAYGA MOORTHY W/O C. VINAYAGA MOORTHY,R2 - R.SRINIVASAN S/O R. RAMAMOORTHY,R3 - S.JAYAKUMAR S/O K.V.SAMBANDAMURTHY,R4 - H.PADMANABAN S/O P.HARI KRISHNAN,R5 - MISS H. VIDYA D/O P.HARI KRISHNAN,VIDE COURT ORDER DT. 12/11/2025,PVT NOTICE,-----------,AOS NOT FILED,MEMO NOT FILED - VIDE COURT ORDER DT. 12/11/2025 1123
-
2.R.SRINIVASAN
-
3.S.JAYAKUMAR
-
4.H.PADMANABAN
-
5.MISS H. VIDYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria CleteView PDF
Summary: SA No. 392/2014 - Anita Ranka v. Sumathi Vinayga Moorthy Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the defendant's Second Appeal, upholding the lower courts' decree granting permanent injunction to the plaintiffs. The court held that a bare injunction suit based on possession (without title declaration) is maintainable, and the plaintiffs' possession of the agricultural properties, evidenced by registered sale deeds and revenue records, entitled them to protection against forcible dispossession by the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Nov-2025
For Final Hearing
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
-
20-Nov-2025
For Final Hearing
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
-
12-Nov-2025
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria CleteView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
Sa Cases - 2014 (Ready Cases)
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
-
31-Oct-2025
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria CleteView PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
-
12-Sep-2025
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria CleteView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Suit For Permanent Injunction In (Sa)
Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria Clete
-
22-Apr-2025
Sa Cases - 2014
Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi
-
08-Apr-2025
Sa Cases - 2014
Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi
-
09-Jun-2020
Final Hearing Cases
Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian
-
18-Mar-2020
Final Hearing Cases
Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian
-
04-Mar-2020
Final Hearing Cases
Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram
-
27-Feb-2020
Final Hearing Cases
Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram
-
23-Jan-2020
Final Hearing Cases
Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram
-
19-Dec-2019
Final Hearing Cases
Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram
-
16-Apr-2014
—
Honourable Mr Justice M.duraiswamy
-
11-Apr-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2014
Case filed
Registration No. SA/392/2014
Summary: SA No. 392/2014 - Anita Ranka v. Sumathi Vinayga Moorthy Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the defendant's Second Appeal, upholding the lower courts' decree granting permanent injunction to the plaintiffs. The court held that a bare injunction suit based on possession (without title declaration) is maintainable, and the plaintiffs' possession of the agricultural properties, evidenced by registered sale deeds and revenue records, entitled them to protection against forcible dispossession by the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts