THE MANAGEMENT M/S.ADVIT LAW CHAMBERS vs D.EDWIN — WP/19542/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA011054812026

Filing Number

WP/78462/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19542/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Labour ( 95 )

Sub-Category

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE MANAGEMENT M/S.ADVIT LAW CHAMBERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D.EDWIN

  2. 2.S.Thiagaraj

  3. 3.N.Nagesh

  4. 4.S.Somasekar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. SurenderView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19542/2026 S.V.P. Engineering (P) Ltd. challenged a Labour Court order from March 2024 that directed reinstatement of four employees with back wages and monetary benefits. The management accepted reinstatement but contested the back wages, providing bank statements showing employees received salaries during the non-employment period. The High Court of Madras granted an interim stay of all proceedings for six weeks, finding the respondents failed to produce contradictory evidence. Notice to respondents was ordered returnable in four weeks, with the case posted thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19542/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19542/2026 S.V.P. Engineering (P) Ltd. challenged a Labour Court order from March 2024 that directed reinstatement of four employees with back wages and monetary benefits. The management accepted reinstatement but contested the back wages, providing bank statements showing employees received salaries during the non-employment period. The High Court of Madras granted an interim stay of all proceedings for six weeks, finding the respondents failed to produce contradictory evidence. Notice to respondents was ordered returnable in four weeks, with the case posted thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case