M/S.Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., M/S.R.GANESAN, V.NANDHA HARI MAHESWARAN,N.NAGARJUNA,N.Mahendra Babu,P.RATHIKA vs A.Jeevitha d/o.K.A.Doss — WP/19562/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011046652026

Filing Number

WP/77767/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19562/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Labour ( 95 )

Sub-Category

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S.Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., M/S.R.GANESAN, V.NANDHA HARI MAHESWARAN,N.NAGARJUNA,N.Mahendra Babu,P.RATHIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A.Jeevitha d/o.K.A.Doss

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. SurenderView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/19562/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed Woosu Automotive's writ petition challenging the Labour Court's reinstatement order for employee A. Jeevitha. The court found that the company was afforded multiple opportunities to present evidence but deliberately failed to do so, then sought remand to reopen evidence after 11 years of litigation involving 59 similar cases. Key Reasoning: Justice K. Surender held that the management's claim of lacking opportunity was "deliberate, palpably wrong" designed to protract proceedings. The Labour Court properly rejected the late application to reopen evidence after the workman had argued her case, given the case's decade-long pendency and prior High Court directions directing management to adduce evidence which went unheeded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19562/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/19562/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed Woosu Automotive's writ petition challenging the Labour Court's reinstatement order for employee A. Jeevitha. The court found that the company was afforded multiple opportunities to present evidence but deliberately failed to do so, then sought remand to reopen evidence after 11 years of litigation involving 59 similar cases. Key Reasoning: Justice K. Surender held that the management's claim of lacking opportunity was "deliberate, palpably wrong" designed to protract proceedings. The Labour Court properly rejected the late application to reopen evidence after the workman had argued her case, given the case's decade-long pendency and prior High Court directions directing management to adduce evidence which went unheeded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case