M/S.Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., M/S.R.GANESAN, V.NANDHA HARI MAHESWARAN,N.NAGARJUNA,N.Mahendra Babu,P.RATHIKA vs Habeeb — WP/19937/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011046642026

Filing Number

WP/77766/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19937/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Labour ( 95 )

Sub-Category

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S.Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., M/S.R.GANESAN, V.NANDHA HARI MAHESWARAN,N.NAGARJUNA,N.Mahendra Babu,P.RATHIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Habeeb

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. SurenderView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/19937/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., upholding the II Additional Labour Court's order that set aside the dismissal of respondent Habeeb and granted reinstatement with back wages and service continuity. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the company's claim that it was denied opportunity to adduce evidence, finding that the Labour Court had granted multiple adjournments and opportunities over 11 years, but the management failed to present its case. The court found the company's assertions to be "deliberate, palpably wrong" and undertaken merely to protract proceedings. Since no violation of natural justice or legal principles was established, the High Court declined to interfere under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19937/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/19937/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., upholding the II Additional Labour Court's order that set aside the dismissal of respondent Habeeb and granted reinstatement with back wages and service continuity. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the company's claim that it was denied opportunity to adduce evidence, finding that the Labour Court had granted multiple adjournments and opportunities over 11 years, but the management failed to present its case. The court found the company's assertions to be "deliberate, palpably wrong" and undertaken merely to protract proceedings. Since no violation of natural justice or legal principles was established, the High Court declined to interfere under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case