LAKSHMI STORES N Chandirasekar, A. Tamizhi,.S. uma Shankar,P.Rajavel vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) (FAC) — WP/19067/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011041242026

e-Filing Number

28-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/77329/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19067/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKSHMI STORES N Chandirasekar, A. Tamizhi,.S. uma Shankar,P.Rajavel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) (FAC)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19067/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order issued by the Assistant Commissioner without hearing the petitioner, finding the denial of reasonable opportunity to contest the demand violated procedural fairness. The matter was remanded for reconsideration with a fresh hearing, subject to the petitioner remitting 25% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19067/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19067/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order issued by the Assistant Commissioner without hearing the petitioner, finding the denial of reasonable opportunity to contest the demand violated procedural fairness. The matter was remanded for reconsideration with a fresh hearing, subject to the petitioner remitting 25% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case