Emerald Agencies SARAVANAN G, ,S.B.Priyadarshini vs Commercial Tax Officer — WP/21308/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011039452026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/77180/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/21308/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Emerald Agencies SARAVANAN G, ,S.B.Priyadarshini
Respondent(s)
-
1.Commercial Tax Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
The Madras High Court set aside a tax assessment order dated 26.12.2025 issued by the Commercial Tax Officer against Emerald Agencies, finding an alleged breach of natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, with the bank attachment to be lifted upon payment. A fresh assessment order must be issued within three months after providing the petitioner reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/21308/2026
The Madras High Court set aside a tax assessment order dated 26.12.2025 issued by the Commercial Tax Officer against Emerald Agencies, finding an alleged breach of natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, with the bank attachment to be lifted upon payment. A fresh assessment order must be issued within three months after providing the petitioner reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts