Tvl M D S MARKETING KABIL DEV S vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) — WP/19140/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011038872026
e-Filing Number
24-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/77142/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/19140/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tvl M D S MARKETING KABIL DEV S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP/19140/2026 The Madras High Court partially allowed the writ petition filed by Tvl M D S Marketing challenging a GST assessment order dated 26-11-2025. The court found that the Assistant Commissioner failed to account for the petitioner's payment made under GST DRC-03 on 08-07-2023 when issuing the impugned order regarding defect no.1 (GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B discrepancies). The court set aside the order partially concerning defect no.1 and remanded it for reconsideration within three months with reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. However, the court upheld the order regarding defects nos. 2 & 3 (interest and penalty), finding these were consequential to the admitted tax liability under Section 73. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/19140/2026
Case Summary: WP/19140/2026 The Madras High Court partially allowed the writ petition filed by Tvl M D S Marketing challenging a GST assessment order dated 26-11-2025. The court found that the Assistant Commissioner failed to account for the petitioner's payment made under GST DRC-03 on 08-07-2023 when issuing the impugned order regarding defect no.1 (GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B discrepancies). The court set aside the order partially concerning defect no.1 and remanded it for reconsideration within three months with reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. However, the court upheld the order regarding defects nos. 2 & 3 (interest and penalty), finding these were consequential to the admitted tax liability under Section 73. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts