TVL R.M. BLUE METALS ROOBAN B, M.DILLI BABU,P.DINESH,S.ASHWIN KESAVAN,A.GOMATHINAYAGAM vs THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES — WP/19869/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011037202026

e-Filing Number

24-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/77003/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19869/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TVL R.M. BLUE METALS ROOBAN B, M.DILLI BABU,P.DINESH,S.ASHWIN KESAVAN,A.GOMATHINAYAGAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

  2. 2.THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER/ THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST)( FAC)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19869/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a commercial tax order dated 30.12.2025 that imposed GST on seigniorage/royalty for TVL R.M. Blue Metals, subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days. The Assessing Officer was directed to provide a fresh opportunity and issue a new order, which remains subject to the Supreme Court's final determination on GST applicability to seigniorage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19869/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19869/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a commercial tax order dated 30.12.2025 that imposed GST on seigniorage/royalty for TVL R.M. Blue Metals, subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days. The Assessing Officer was directed to provide a fresh opportunity and issue a new order, which remains subject to the Supreme Court's final determination on GST applicability to seigniorage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case