PUSHPAVALLI SURESH BABHU M/S.ESWAR KUMAR AND RAO LAW FIRM vs THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION — REV.APPL/117/2025

Case under U/s 114 R/w Order Xlvii Rule I of Cpc Section 114. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011034922025

Filing Number

REV.APPL/73441/2025

Filing Date

30-Apr-2025

Registration No

REV.APPL/117/2025

Registration Date

20-Jun-2025

Judge

Honourable Dr.Justice Anita Sumanth , Honourable Mr.Justice C.kumarappan

Coram

Honourable Dr.Justice Anita Sumanth , Honourable Mr.Justice C.kumarappan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 114 R/w Order Xlvii Rule I of Cpc Section 114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHPAVALLI SURESH BABHU M/S.ESWAR KUMAR AND RAO LAW FIRM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION

  2. 2.The District Registrar (Admn)

  3. 3.The Sub Registrar

  4. 4.S.Mohamed Aslam

  5. 5.A.Abdul Hadi

  6. 6.A.M.Ahamed Faizal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Dr.Justice Anita SUMANTH,Honourable Mr.Justice C.kumarappanView PDF

    The Madras High Court permitted the petitioner Pushpavalli Suresh Babhu to withdraw her review petition challenging a February 2025 writ appeal order. The court notably observed that there was no material evidence supporting the lower court's observation that the original writ petition was filed to settle private scores, thereby criticizing the unsupported finding made by the writ court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Dr.Justice Anita Sumanth , Honourable Mr.Justice C.kumarappan

  4. 30-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. REV.APPL/117/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court permitted the petitioner Pushpavalli Suresh Babhu to withdraw her review petition challenging a February 2025 writ appeal order. The court notably observed that there was no material evidence supporting the lower court's observation that the original writ petition was filed to settle private scores, thereby criticizing the unsupported finding made by the writ court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case