V.Santha S.T.Bharath Gowtham, KAUSHIKA.P,SURYA.K vs The Commissioner — CMP/11655/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011030492026

Filing Number

CMP/76472/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP/11655/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Endowments/Temples/Wakfs ( 58 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V.Santha S.T.Bharath Gowtham, KAUSHIKA.P,SURYA.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Commissioner

  2. 2.The Joint Commissioner

  3. 3.G.Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP 11655/2026 The Madras High Court granted V. Santha's petition to condone a 412-day delay in re-presenting a writ appeal against the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HRCE) Commission and G. Kumar. The court, citing reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, ordered the delay to be condoned and allowed the petition to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/11655/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP 11655/2026 The Madras High Court granted V. Santha's petition to condone a 412-day delay in re-presenting a writ appeal against the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HRCE) Commission and G. Kumar. The court, citing reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, ordered the delay to be condoned and allowed the petition to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case