M/s .M K B VARTHAGAM K M Malarmannan, R.SUNDARAMURTHY vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) — WP/19131/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011029772026

e-Filing Number

24-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/76422/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19131/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s .M K B VARTHAGAM K M Malarmannan, R.SUNDARAMURTHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside a tax assessment order dated 20.12.2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (ST) against M/s MKB Varthagam, finding the order was issued without hearing the petitioner, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with a condition that the petitioner remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must provide a reasonable opportunity to contest and issue a fresh order within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside a tax assessment order dated 20.12.2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (ST) against M/s MKB Varthagam, finding the order was issued without hearing the petitioner, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with a condition that the petitioner remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must provide a reasonable opportunity to contest and issue a fresh order within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case