P.SUBRAMANIAN vs The Secretary — WP/19192/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011025152026

Filing Number

WP/76055/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19192/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Provident Fund ( 127 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.SUBRAMANIAN

    Adv. R.P.Prathap Singh,K.Gopi-MS/702/2006,K.Gopi-MS/702/2006, ,P.Ganesh,K.Gopi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Secretary

  2. 2.The Assistant PF Commissioner (PoHR)

  3. 3.The Assistant Commissioner,

  4. 4.The Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. SurenderView PDF

    Summary of WP No. 19192 of 2026 The Madras High Court directed the Assistant PF Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of the Employment Provident Fund to consider P. Subramanian's representation dated 04.03.2026 regarding enhanced pension and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. Subramanian, who served 35 years (1986-2021) at Kilpauk Benefit Saswatha Nidhi Ltd., sought a mandamus directing consideration of his enhanced pension application, claiming prescribed procedures were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19192/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP No. 19192 of 2026 The Madras High Court directed the Assistant PF Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of the Employment Provident Fund to consider P. Subramanian's representation dated 04.03.2026 regarding enhanced pension and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. Subramanian, who served 35 years (1986-2021) at Kilpauk Benefit Saswatha Nidhi Ltd., sought a mandamus directing consideration of his enhanced pension application, claiming prescribed procedures were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case