M/s. Madurantagam Agricultural Producers vs The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II — WP/21217/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011023802026

Filing Number

WP/75945/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/21217/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Provident Fund ( 127 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. Madurantagam Agricultural Producers

    Adv. P.Thangaraju, M.AISHWWARIYA,R.MANOHARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. SurenderView PDF

    The Madras High Court partially allowed the writ petition filed by Madurantagam Agricultural Producers Co-operative Society against EPF damages of Rs. 25,57,557 imposed for delayed contribution deposits. The court directed the society to pay Rs. 10 lakhs within four weeks, substantially reducing the original damages, recognizing that cooperative societies operating on non-profit principles deserve leniency similar to sick industrial companies under EPF law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/21217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court partially allowed the writ petition filed by Madurantagam Agricultural Producers Co-operative Society against EPF damages of Rs. 25,57,557 imposed for delayed contribution deposits. The court directed the society to pay Rs. 10 lakhs within four weeks, substantially reducing the original damages, recognizing that cooperative societies operating on non-profit principles deserve leniency similar to sick industrial companies under EPF law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case