Sri Vela Stores Adithya Reddy, VAANI SREEKANT IYER,DHANESH,PRANAV DEVARAJ,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise, — WP/19200/2026

Case under U/s 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 Section 73. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCMA011020842026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

17-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/75710/2026

Filing Date

17-04-2026

Registration No

WP/19200/2026

Registration Date

08-05-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

U/s 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 Section 73

Petitioner(s)

Sri Vela Stores Adithya Reddy, VAANI SREEKANT IYER,DHANESH,PRANAV DEVARAJ,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM

Respondent(s)

Superintendent of GST and Central Excise,

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

08-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

08-06-2026
Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Summary of WP No. 19200/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 21.08.2024 against Sri Vela Stores for FY 2019-20, which was challenged on natural justice grounds. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the GST Superintendent must issue a fresh order with reasonable opportunity to the petitioner within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP No. 19200/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 21.08.2024 against Sri Vela Stores for FY 2019-20, which was challenged on natural justice grounds. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the GST Superintendent must issue a fresh order with reasonable opportunity to the petitioner within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

U/s 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case