PETROS PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED Mitra B, M. Divyanathan,M. Madanraj,Snekha GSD vs The State Tax Officer (South)- III Assessment Circle — WP/19035/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011017482026
e-Filing Number
22-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/75454/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/19035/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PETROS PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED Mitra B, M. Divyanathan,M. Madanraj,Snekha GSD
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Tax Officer (South)- III Assessment Circle
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP 19035/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST demand order (dated 03.12.2024) issued by the State Tax Officer against Petros Promoters Private Limited for FY 2021-2022, finding it was issued without providing the petitioner a hearing opportunity. The court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand (adjusted for Rs. 19,000 already recovered) within 30 days, with the tax authority required to issue a fresh order within three months and bank attachments to be lifted upon compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/19035/2026
Case Summary: WP 19035/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST demand order (dated 03.12.2024) issued by the State Tax Officer against Petros Promoters Private Limited for FY 2021-2022, finding it was issued without providing the petitioner a hearing opportunity. The court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand (adjusted for Rs. 19,000 already recovered) within 30 days, with the tax authority required to issue a fresh order within three months and bank attachments to be lifted upon compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts