Sree Shanmuga Steels S.DURAIRAJ, MADHUMITHA.K,KIRUTHIKA.R,S.ARVINDH,MARIA SANJANA.J,G.DERRICK SAM vs The State Tax Officer (ST) — WP/17625/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011014422026
e-Filing Number
21-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/75217/2026
Filing Date
21-04-2026
Registration No
WP/17625/2026
Registration Date
28-04-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
02nd June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sree Shanmuga Steels S.DURAIRAJ, MADHUMITHA.K,KIRUTHIKA.R,S.ARVINDH,MARIA SANJANA.J,G.DERRICK SAM
Respondent(s)
The State Tax Officer (ST)
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: WP 17625/2026 Sree Shanmuga Steels challenged a GST tax order dated 8.12.2025 issued by the State Tax Officer, alleging breach of natural justice principles. The High Court of Madras found the appeal period had expired but accepted a settlement where the petitioner agreed to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. The court set aside the original order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the tax authority to issue a fresh order within three months of receiving the 25% payment and after granting the petitioner reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: WP 17625/2026 Sree Shanmuga Steels challenged a GST tax order dated 8.12.2025 issued by the State Tax Officer, alleging breach of natural justice principles. The High Court of Madras found the appeal period had expired but accepted a settlement where the petitioner agreed to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. The court set aside the original order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the tax authority to issue a fresh order within three months of receiving the 25% payment and after granting the petitioner reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts