Jai Durga Envirocare Private Limited CHINNASAMY V, D.BHOOPALAN,K.PALANIAMMAL,R.JAYA,R.SITHARTHAN,M.RAMIAH vs The Deputy State Tax Officer -2, — WP/19015/2026

Case under U/s Ii Rules 4 (24 of as Rules) Section 73. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011013782026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/75159/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19015/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s Ii Rules 4 (24 of as Rules) Section 73

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jai Durga Envirocare Private Limited CHINNASAMY V, D.BHOOPALAN,K.PALANIAMMAL,R.JAYA,R.SITHARTHAN,M.RAMIAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy State Tax Officer -2,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19015/2026 Jai Durga Envirocare Private Limited challenged a GST tax order dated 14.02.2025 issued without providing reasonable opportunity to contest the demand. The Madras High Court found the order was issued without hearing the petitioner but noted the petition was filed beyond limitation period. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration on condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within 3 months after providing reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19015/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19015/2026 Jai Durga Envirocare Private Limited challenged a GST tax order dated 14.02.2025 issued without providing reasonable opportunity to contest the demand. The Madras High Court found the order was issued without hearing the petitioner but noted the petition was filed beyond limitation period. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration on condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within 3 months after providing reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case