VASARKKAL vs THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER I — WP/19911/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011013772026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/75158/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19911/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VASARKKAL

    Adv. V.Chinnasamy,M.Ramiah,M.Ramiah, D.Bhoopalan,K.Palaniammal,R.Jaya,R.Sitharthan,M.Ramiah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER I

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax order dated 19.12.2025 issued against Vasarkkal by the Deputy State Tax Officer, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, and directed a fresh order to be issued within three months after providing the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19911/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax order dated 19.12.2025 issued against Vasarkkal by the Deputy State Tax Officer, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, and directed a fresh order to be issued within three months after providing the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case