Sri Lakshmi Enterprises Khathiravan C, G.SANJAY ,A.PRASHANTH vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 — WP/17986/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011012282026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/75080/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17986/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Lakshmi Enterprises Khathiravan C, G.SANJAY ,A.PRASHANTH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deputy State Tax Officer-2

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 17986/2026 The Madras High Court quashed a GST tax demand order (dated 19.11.2025) issued by the Deputy State Tax Officer against Sri Lakshmi Enterprises, finding the order was passed without providing the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months following a fair hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17986/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 17986/2026 The Madras High Court quashed a GST tax demand order (dated 19.11.2025) issued by the Deputy State Tax Officer against Sri Lakshmi Enterprises, finding the order was passed without providing the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months following a fair hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case